Article viewed 98 times

17 Jul 2024
Add to Bookmarks


 

AO/OTA 43-C3 Pilon Fracture through a posterolateral approach


Score and Comment on this Case

Select a Score out of 10, and add a comment in the field below

Respectfully consider international variabilty in surgical technique and implants when commenting.
Protected by reCAPTCHA - Privacy and Terms


Clinical Details

Clinical and radiological findings:  A 65-year-old male polytrauma patient following a fall from scaffolding >5 meters. The patient sustained multiple axial skeletal injuries, with a pilon fracture identified during initial polytrauma CT screening. An external fixator was placed during the initial stabilization of other injuries.

Preoperative Plan

Planning remarks:  The planned surgical approach involved a two-phase procedure. The first phase utilized a posterolateral approach to the distal tibia and fibula for fracture reduction and fixation. The second phase involved supine repositioning anda medial approach to address the medial malleolus together with syndesmotic stabilization.

Surgical Discussion

Patient positioning:  Initially prone with the left limb secured in an external fixator device, supported by a carbon fiber roll under the external fixator frame at the level of the left ankle. The second phase involved repositioning to supine for medial approach and removal o

Anatomical surgical approach:  A longitudinal incision was made over the posterolateral aspect of the distal tibia. Subcutaneous dissection exposed and retracted the sural nerve medially. The anatomical plane between the peroneus muscles and flexor hallucis longus was identified, allowing blunt dissection towards the posterolateral cortical margin of the distal tibia. Partial sharp dissection of flexor hallucis longus from its attachment on the posterior aspect of fibula provided exposure for accessing two-thirds of the tibial surface down to joint level. The fibula was exposed by circumnavigating lateral aspects of peroneal muscles, raising a full-thickness flap, and reducing and stabilizing fracture sites with a 2.7 mm mini fragment locking plate. The second phase involved a direct medial approach to the medial malleolus, revealing fracture complexities and securing with a medial distal 3.5 mm locking plate.

Operative remarks: 

Despite moderate callus formation around multiple bony fragments limiting mobilization, debridement and sequential mobilization were feasible. Achieving complete anatomical reduction of the tibial plafond while maintaining positioning within the external fixation frame proved unattainable through manipulation alone. Provisional stabilization using K-wires allowed for de-rotation and restoration to physiological length before affixing a pre-contoured 12-hole 2.7 mm mini fragment plate along the posterolateral margin. Given extensive comminution rendering anterolateral rim unsuitable for plating reconstruction, limited exposure facilitated fragment-specific fixation enhancing cortical contour restoration at anterolateral corner albeit without directly addressing main comminution at joint level due to involvement with anterior syndesmotic fibers origin necessitating percutaneous insertion of a 3.5 mm syndesmosis screw stabilizing fibula-tibia interface promoting secondary bone healing without direct fixation need.

Postoperative protocol:   Not specified

Follow up:   Not specified

Orthopaedic implants used:   - 2.7 mm mini fragment locking plate - 3.5 mm medial distal locking plate - 3.5 mm syndesmosis screw - K-wires

Search for Related Literature

Powered by OrthoSearch - The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery


#

Dr Ed Oates

  • Germany , Schleswig Holstein
  • Area of Specialty - General Trauma
  • Position - Specialist Consultant
#
Industry Sponsership

contact us for advertising opportunities


Peer Review Score

Average Score based on 0 reviews